Dr. Peter Enns on the Bible and Contemporary Christian Faith

Welcome to
a time to tear down | A Time to Build Up

Dr. Peter E. EnnsThe focus of this website is Biblical Theology and Biblical Studies and how these fields interface with contemporary Christian faith. Although I certainly hope that some of what is expressed here will be persuasive to some readers, my intention is not to debate but to continue conversations on matters that I feel are very important. Read more >>>

Dr. Peter Enns

N. T. Wright interview at BioLogos

My first of several video interviews of N. T. Wright is up this morning at BioLogos. This one is on the humanity of Jesus.


Giberson vs. Mohler on Darwin

Karl Giberson has responded to Al Mohler’s post on Darwin and the Bible. Mohler’s choice not to engage the topic is disappointing but I am still holding out hope that some dialogue will result. Giberson’s post has links to Mohler’s original post on his own site plus previously published responses to Mohler at BioLogos.


“Image of God” Part 4

My fourth and final post on the Image of God is up at BioLogos.


Atheists are Believers, Too.

My latest essay is up at the Huffington Post.


“Image of God” Part 3

My third image of God post is up on BioLogos today. Main point: the New Testament writers argue that the resurrected Christ fully embodies the image of God, thus making him more fully human than any other.


“Image of God” Part 2

My second post on the image of God is up today at BioLogos. The “image of God” in Genesis 1:26-27 refers to humanity’s role in ruling creation as God’s representatives. It does not refer to the soul or psycho-spiritual qualities like reason or consciousness. This is better that Netflix, I promise you.


Anne Rice “Quits Christianity”

Many are familiar with Anne Rice’s spiritual journey from Roman Catholicism and back again. Just today she announced that she has had it with Christianity and has quit.

In her own words, from the Huffington Post article, which pasted her FB status updates:

On my Facebook account–where all true theological discourse happens–I posted the link to her announcement and the responses have been mixed. Some think it is all contrived, a PR boost for her next book. Others think she is being theologically naive to think she can continue in her Christian journey alone. Others think this is both genuine and understandable.

Feel free to post your thoughts, in a non-disputatious manner.


Rachel Evans’s “Evolving in Monkey Town”

Rachel Evans thinks doubt is a part of faith. In fact she thinks doubt can save your faith–provided you have the faith to doubt and the courage to learn from it what God may be showing you.

I agree with Rachel, and I wish I could say it as well as she does in her just-published memoir Evolving in Monkey Town.

Like a lot of people out there, I picked up the book (actually, Rachel gave me a copy at a conference –yeah me), and I couldn’t put it down. It struck a cord with me (here and here), but more importantly, it became quickly clear to me that there are a LOT of people who will benefit from Rachel’s honesty and insights.

Rachel connects with Christians who believe the Gospel, or think they do, or want to, but whose inner-theological gatekeeper collides with their life experience. Evangelicalism and fundamentalism are losing steam for many young people–not because they are rebellious or naive or unlearned–but because the ecclesiastical and theological paradigms with which they are familiar have lost their explanatory power.

Critics will say that subjective experience does not determine theological truth. This is false, since any articulation of theological truth involves an inescapable subjective dimension. My proof for this is the theological diversity that has existed throughout the history of the church and continues today throughout the world.


Subjective experience, such as Rachel’s, actually exposes the inadequacies of any theological tradition when it holds itself in too high regard. It reminds us, sometimes painfully, that these traditions are not the Gospel itself but impermanent ways of understanding it. They are provisional, always in need of refinement, adjustment, augmentation, deletion–and when and where need be, abandonment.

Rachel’s critics will likely mistake her criticism of the paradigms with criticism of the Gospel itself–which precisely misses the point of the book.  Rachel’s crisis of faith was fueled by her religious education, which failed to distinguish between the two--to question one is to question the other.

In a word, this book is about how Rachel learned to stop doing that. Such a journey is risky, because it involves moving away from all that is familiar and comforting. But for Rachel and many like her, staying put is not an option.


Why Religion Pollsters Should Go to Seminary First

My latest gentle and self-effacing article in the Huffington Post is now up. My point is the religion pollsters I mention in this post have some pretty unreflective ideas of what Christians believe. My last post resulted in mass atheist conversions–although I am not sure in which direction.


The Creator is the Redeemer

This week’s BioLogos post is up. It is a bit of a departure from the typical, but I think helps to round out an important biblical theological theme.