<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>a time to tear down &#124; A Time to Build Up &#187; biblical authority</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peterennsonline.com/category/biblical-authority/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peterennsonline.com</link>
	<description>Dr. Peter Enns on the Bible and Contemporary Christian Faith</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 16:45:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NT Wright interview, 4-20-10</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/19/nt-wright-interview-4-20-09/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/19/nt-wright-interview-4-20-09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inerrancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am interviewing NT Wright in NYC tomorrow on camera for BioLogos. Apparently, you can submit questions through Twitter or the BioLogos Facebook page, and we will see what we can get to.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interviewing NT Wright in NYC tomorrow on camera for BioLogos. Apparently, you can submit questions through Twitter or the BioLogos Facebook page, and we will see what we can get to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/19/nt-wright-interview-4-20-09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World News Tonight Piece on Waltke and Evolution Airs</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/17/world-news-tonight-piece-on-waltke-and-evolution-airs/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/17/world-news-tonight-piece-on-waltke-and-evolution-airs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inerrancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can access the WNT piece on YouTube. As you can see, I am on camera for about as much time as it takes you to sneeze. Still, I am sitting by the phone patiently waiting for movie offers to come rolling in. All kidding aside (was I kidding?), you can see that the story [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can access the WNT piece on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uMTi8fmASY">YouTube</a>. As you can see, I am on camera for about as much time as it takes you to sneeze. Still, I am sitting by the phone patiently waiting for movie offers to come rolling in.</p>
<p>All kidding aside (was I kidding?), you can see that the story was handled with some objectivity, with little attempt to incriminate Waltke or RTS. Neither did ABC opt for an incendiary approach, which they could easily have done. I don&#8217;t think Ken Ham is a good representative of the Evangelical counterculture, though, since his views are so idiosyncratic (I don&#8217;t think RTS faculty think that there were dinosaurs on the ark).</p>
<p>The heart of the issue did come through, though, as far as I am concerned, which is: what happened between BKW and RTS should not have happened, but, given the general &#8220;culture of fear&#8221; concerning evolution among Evangelicals, it was inevitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/17/world-news-tonight-piece-on-waltke-and-evolution-airs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Walton Responds to Poythress at BioLogos</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/02/05/walton-responds-to-poythress-at-biologos/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/02/05/walton-responds-to-poythress-at-biologos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inerrancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Walton has written a response to Vern Poythress&#8217;s review of The Lost World of Genesis One. There are some important hermeneutical and theological issues involved that should be of interest to many. Check it out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Walton has written a <a href="http://biologos.org/blog/john-walton-responds-to-vern-poythress/">response</a> to Vern Poythress&#8217;s review of <em>The Lost World of Genesis One</em>. There are some important hermeneutical and theological issues involved that should be of interest to many. Check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/02/05/walton-responds-to-poythress-at-biologos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Review of Beale’s Erosion of Inerrancy</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/01/15/my-review-of-beales-erosion-of-inerrancy/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/01/15/my-review-of-beales-erosion-of-inerrancy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I&I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inerrancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT use of the OT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With my permission as well as that of the Bulletin for Biblical Research, Art Boulet has posted my published response to Greg Beale&#8217;s The Erosion of Inerrancy in Evangelicalism.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With my permission as well as that of the <em><a href="http://www.ibr-bbr.org/IBR_BBR.aspx">Bulletin for Biblical Research</a>, </em>Art Boulet has posted my <a href="http://aboulet.com/2010/01/14/enns-reviews-beales-erosion-of-inerrancy-in-evangelicalism/">published response</a> to Greg Beale&#8217;s <em>The Erosion of Inerrancy in Evangelicalism</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/01/15/my-review-of-beales-erosion-of-inerrancy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Science &amp; the Sacred Post: A Different Angle</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/12/04/new-science-the-sacred-post-a-different-angle/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/12/04/new-science-the-sacred-post-a-different-angle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elsewhere on the web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a new guest post on the Science and the Sacred Blog or the BioLogos Foundation (@BioLogosOrg on Twitter). This one is called &#8220;Let&#8217;s Come at This From a Different Angle.&#8221; I propose that our reading of the opening chapters of the Bible ought to be informed by the closing chapters of the Bible. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a new guest post on the <a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/scienceandthesacred/">Science and the Sacred Blog</a> or the <a href="http://biologos.org/">BioLogos Foundation</a> (@BioLogosOrg on Twitter). This one is called &#8220;<a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/scienceandthesacred/2009/12/lets-come-at-this-from-a-different-angle.html">Let&#8217;s Come at This From a Different Angle</a>.&#8221; I propose that our reading of the opening chapters of the Bible ought to be informed by the closing chapters of the Bible.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/scienceandthesacred/2009/12/lets-come-at-this-from-a-different-angle.html">Read the full post</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/scienceandthesacred/author/pete-enns/2009/12/">Read all my Science &amp; the Sacred posts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/12/04/new-science-the-sacred-post-a-different-angle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Position: BioLogos Foundation Senior Fellow of Biblical Studies</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/12/02/new-position-biologos-foundation-senior-fellow-of-biblical-studies/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/12/02/new-position-biologos-foundation-senior-fellow-of-biblical-studies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evangelicalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scripture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On December 1, 2009, the BioLogos Foundation published the following announcement: The BioLogos Foundation is happy to announce that biblical scholar Pete Enns has joined our team as a senior fellow of biblical studies. Enns is an evangelical Christian scholar and author of several books and commentaries, including the popular Inspiration and Incarnation: Evangelicals and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biologos.org/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-669" title="biologos_logo" src="http://peterennsonline.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/biologos_logo.jpg" alt="biologos_logo" width="200" height="143" /></a>On December 1, 2009, the <a href="http://biologos.org/">BioLogos Foundation</a> published the following announcement:</p>
<blockquote><p>The BioLogos Foundation is happy to announce that biblical scholar Pete Enns has joined our team as a senior fellow of biblical studies. Enns is an evangelical Christian scholar and author of several books and commentaries, including the popular <a href="http://biologos.org/resources/inspiration-and-incarnation/"><em>Inspiration and Incarnation: Evangelicals and the Problem of the Old Testament</em></a>, which looks at three questions raised by biblical scholars that seem to threaten traditional views of Scripture. Enns has also been a contributor to our blog <a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/scienceandthesacred/" target="_blank"><em>Science &amp; the Sacred</em></a>. His full biography can be found under <a href="http://biologos.org/about/team">“Team Members”</a> in our <a href="http://biologos.org/about/">“About Us”</a> section.</p></blockquote>
<p>BioLogos represents the harmony of science and faith. It addresses the central themes of science and religion and emphasizes the compatibility of Christian faith with scientific discoveries about the origins of the universe and life.  To communicate this message to the general public and add to the ongoing dialog, The BioLogos Foundation created <a href="http://biologos.org/">BioLogos.org</a>.</p>
<p>You can get regular updates and links to resources from BioLogos by following them on Twitter (@BioLogosOrg) or by becoming a &#8220;fan&#8221; of their <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-BioLogos-Foundation/91142327180?ref=ts#/pages/The-BioLogos-Foundation/91142327180">Facebook Page</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/12/02/new-position-biologos-foundation-senior-fellow-of-biblical-studies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Post on Science &amp; an Incarnational Approach to the Bible</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/11/06/guest-post-on-science-an-incarnational-approach-to-the-bible/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/11/06/guest-post-on-science-an-incarnational-approach-to-the-bible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I&I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inerrancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Starting today Science and the Sacred, the blog of the BioLogos Foundation, is running a series of guest post by me, titled &#8220;Science and an Incarnational Approach to the Bible.&#8221; Click here to read the first post.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/scienceandthesacred/2009/11/science-and-an-incarnational-approach-to-the-bible.html"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-651" title="sands_masthead" src="http://peterennsonline.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/sands_masthead1-300x73.jpg" alt="sands_masthead" width="300" height="73" /></a>Starting today Science and the Sacred, the blog of the <a href="http://www.biologos.org/">BioLogos Foundation</a>, is running a series of guest post by me, titled &#8220;Science and an Incarnational Approach to the Bible.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/scienceandthesacred/2009/11/science-and-an-incarnational-approach-to-the-bible.html">Click here to read the first post</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/11/06/guest-post-on-science-an-incarnational-approach-to-the-bible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Authors Enter Discussion of I&amp;I and GWHW at Jesus Creed</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/05/25/authors-enter-discussion-of-ii-and-gwhw-at-jesus-creed/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/05/25/authors-enter-discussion-of-ii-and-gwhw-at-jesus-creed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elsewhere on the web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I&I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inerrancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incarnational analogy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenton Sparks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wanted to alert my readers that there is an interesting disscussion of my book (Inspiration and Incarnation: Evangelicals and the Problem of the Old Testament) and my friend Kenton Sparks&#8217;s book (God&#8217;s Word in Human Words: An Evangelical Appropriation of Critical Biblical Scholarship) over on Scot McKnight&#8217;s Jesus Creed blog. The discussion has been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to alert my readers that there is an interesting disscussion of my book (<em><a class="zem_slink" title="Inspiration and Incarnation: Evangelicals and the Problem of the Old Testament" rel="amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com/Inspiration-Incarnation-Evangelicals-Problem-Testament/dp/0801027306%3FSubscriptionId%3D0G81C5DAZ03ZR9WH9X82%26tag%3Dsacredjourn0a-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3D0801027306">Inspiration and Incarnation: Evangelicals and the Problem of the Old Testament</a></em>) and my friend Kenton Sparks&#8217;s book (<em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0801027012?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=sacredjourn0a-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0801027012">God&#8217;s Word in Human Words: An Evangelical Appropriation of Critical Biblical Scholarship</a></em>) over on Scot McKnight&#8217;s Jesus Creed blog. The discussion has been initiated by Scot&#8217;s frequent guest poster, &#8220;RJS.&#8221; <a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/jesuscreed/2009/05/the-bible-and-knowledge-5---i_comments.html">Read the post and discussion here</a>.</p>
<p>Both Sparks and I have entered into the discussion in the comments. (My comments begin at #36.) Hint: In order to see the entire comment thread, you have to click the &#8220;Comments&#8221; link under the post.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/a55b7eb2-36ad-47ab-a652-60d896135178/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_a.png?x-id=a55b7eb2-36ad-47ab-a652-60d896135178" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/05/25/authors-enter-discussion-of-ii-and-gwhw-at-jesus-creed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Inerrant Wisdom by Paul Seely</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/05/04/review-inerrant-wisdom-by-paul-seely/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/05/04/review-inerrant-wisdom-by-paul-seely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 04:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inerrancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT use of the OT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just posted a new book review: Inerrant Wisdom: Science and Inerrancy in Biblical Persective]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just posted a new book review: <a href="http://peterennsonline.com/book-reviews/review-inerrant-wisdom-by-paul-seely/"><em>Inerrant Wisdom: Science and Inerrancy in Biblical Persective</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/05/04/review-inerrant-wisdom-by-paul-seely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>God&#8217;s Word in Human Words by Kent Sparks: Part Two</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/04/21/gods-word-in-human-words-by-kent-sparks-part-two/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/04/21/gods-word-in-human-words-by-kent-sparks-part-two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 03:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I&I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inerrancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Arnold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God's Word in Human Words]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenton Sparks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SBL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Chapman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Part 1 of my review of God&#8217;s Word in Human Words by Kenton Sparks, I set out what I saw as the central tenets of the book. We now continue with my report on a panel discussion of the book in which I participated this past fall. PART 2: SBL Panel Discussion On November [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="western"><em>In<a href="http://peterennsonline.com/book-reviews/review-gods-word-in-human-words-by-kent-sparks/"> Part 1</a> of my review of </em>God&#8217;s Word in Human Words <em>by Kenton Sparks, I set out what I saw as the central tenets of the book. We now continue with my report on a panel discussion of the book in which I participated this past fall.</em></p>
<p class="western"><strong>PART 2: <a class="zem_slink" title="Society of Biblical Literature" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_of_Biblical_Literature">SBL</a> Panel Discussion</strong></p>
<p class="western">On November 23, 2008, a Society of Biblical Literature (SBL) session was devoted to a discussion of Kenton Sparks&#8217; book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0801027012?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=sacredjourn0a-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0801027012"><em>God&#8217;s Word in Human Words: An Evangelical Appropriation of Critical Scholarship</em></a> (<em>GWHW)</em>. The panel was made up of: Stephen Chapman (<a href="http://www.divinity.duke.edu/">Duke Divinity School</a>), Bill Arnold (<a class="zem_slink" title="Asbury Theological Seminary" rel="homepage" href="http://www.asburyseminary.edu/">Asbury Theological Seminary</a>), myself, and Gary Anderson (moderator, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Notre_Dame">Notre Dame</a>).</p>
<p><a href="http://peterennsonline.com/book-reviews/kent-sparks-gods-word-in-human-words-part-two-sbl-panel-discussion//"><em>Continue reading &gt;&gt;&gt;</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/04/21/gods-word-in-human-words-by-kent-sparks-part-two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

