<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>a time to tear down &#124; A Time to Build Up &#187; biblical studies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peterennsonline.com/category/biblical-studies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peterennsonline.com</link>
	<description>Dr. Peter Enns on the Bible and Contemporary Christian Faith</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:31:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gilgamesh, Atrahasis, and the Flood, Parts 2 and 3</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/06/22/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood-parts-2-and-3/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/06/22/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood-parts-2-and-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The final two parts (two and three) of my three-part discussion of the biblical flood vis-a-vis Mesopotamian literature is now up on the BioLogos website. Hint, yes I think the Mesopotamian literature is very important for understanding the theology of the biblical story  :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The final two parts (<a href="http://biologos.org/blog/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood-part-2/">two</a> and <a href="http://biologos.org/blog/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood-part-3/#comments">three</a>) of my three-part discussion of the biblical flood vis-a-vis Mesopotamian literature is now up on the BioLogos website. Hint, yes I think the Mesopotamian literature is very important for understanding the theology of the biblical story  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/06/22/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood-parts-2-and-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gilgamesh, Atrahasis, and the Flood</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/06/01/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/06/01/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 17:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is this week&#8217;s BioLogos post where we look at the similarities between these Mesopotamian and the biblical flood story.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biologos.org/blog/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood/">Here</a> is this week&#8217;s BioLogos post where we look at the similarities between these Mesopotamian and the biblical flood story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/06/01/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genesis 2-9 and Atrahasis</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/25/genesis-2-9-and-atrahasis/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/25/genesis-2-9-and-atrahasis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is this week&#8217;s post at BioLogos, this one on the well-known similarities between Israel&#8217;s second creation story and the Atrahasis Epic. As we saw with last week&#8217;s post on Genesis 1 and Enuma Elish, Genesis 2-9 and Atrahasis breathe the same air. They share ancient Mesopotamian ways of talking about origins. This is a clear indication [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biologos.org/blog/the-second-creation-story-and-atrahasis/">Here</a> is this week&#8217;s post at BioLogos, this one on the well-known similarities between Israel&#8217;s second creation story and the Atrahasis Epic. As we saw with last week&#8217;s post on Genesis 1 and <em>Enuma Elish</em>, Genesis 2-9 and <em>Atrahasis</em> breathe the same air. They share ancient Mesopotamian ways of talking about origins. This is a clear indication that the second creation story does not speak to contemporary science. Hence, (1) it cannot and should not be harmonized with contemporary science, (2) it should not control what can be concluded from scientific investigation.</p>
<p>Genesis 2-9 is an ancient story asking addressing ancient issues. Understanding that ancient context will keep us from asking this story to deliver more than it is prepared to. And it will also help us mine the theological depths of what this story said <em>to ancient Israelites</em> nearly three millennia ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/25/genesis-2-9-and-atrahasis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genesis 1 and Enuma Elish</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/19/genesis-1-and-enuma-elish/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/19/genesis-1-and-enuma-elish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 18:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is this week&#8217;s blog post at BioLogos on a perennial topic: the relationship between Genesis 1 and the Babylonian creation myth Enuma Elish. Both stories are distinct yet they clearly breath the same ancient air when it comes to describing origins.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biologos.org/blog/genesis-1-and-a-babylonian-creation-story/">Here</a> is this week&#8217;s blog post at BioLogos on a perennial topic: the relationship between Genesis 1 and the Babylonian creation myth <em>Enuma Elish</em>. Both stories are distinct yet they clearly breath the same ancient air when it comes to describing origins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/19/genesis-1-and-enuma-elish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Israel&#8217;s Two Creation Stories (Part 3)</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/12/israels-two-creation-stories-part-3/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/12/israels-two-creation-stories-part-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 12:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is the third and final BioLogos post on the differences between the two creation accounts in Genesis 1 and 2 (God&#8217;s names, different methods of creating, different views of humanity). The purpose of seeing these differences is not to hold the two stories apart, but to understand why they are placed where they are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biologos.org/blog/israels-two-creation-stories-part-3/">Here</a> is the third and final BioLogos post on the differences between the two creation accounts in Genesis 1 and 2 (God&#8217;s names, different methods of creating, different views of humanity). The purpose of seeing these differences is not to hold the two stories apart, but to understand why they are placed where they are in the Old Testament. Blurring the differences will blur the theology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/12/israels-two-creation-stories-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on Israel&#8217;s Two Creation Stories</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/04/more-on-israels-two-creation-stories/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/04/more-on-israels-two-creation-stories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 21:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part two of my summary of the differences between the two creation stories in Genesis is posted today on the BioLogos blog. This week I look at the different literary styles and different depictions of God.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part two of my summary of the differences between the two creation stories in Genesis is posted today on the BioLogos <a href="http://biologos.org/blog/israels-two-creation-stories-part-2/">blog</a>. This week I look at the different literary styles and different depictions of God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/04/more-on-israels-two-creation-stories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gary Anderson on Augustine and the Fall</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/28/gary-anderson-on-augustine-and-the-fall/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/28/gary-anderson-on-augustine-and-the-fall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NT use of the OT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hermeneutics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gary Anderson (if I have to explain you wouldn&#8217;t understand) has shared some thoughts on Augustine and Scripture at BioLogos.  Specifically, Anderson’s post concerns Adam and how Augustine understood him with respect to Eve’s culpability in the fall. This post does not directly affect the kinds of scientific matters that normally occupy BioLogos, but there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary Anderson (if I have to explain you wouldn&#8217;t understand) has shared some thoughts on Augustine and Scripture at <a href="http://biologos.org/blog/st-augustine-taking-scripture-literally/">BioLogos</a>.  Specifically, Anderson’s post concerns Adam and how Augustine understood him with respect to Eve’s culpability in the fall. This post does not directly affect the kinds of scientific matters that normally occupy BioLogos, but there is value of this post for other reasons. Anderson is reminding us that interpreting the notion of the “fall” in the Garden episode has numerous dimensions of complexity and ambiguity, and that brilliant and capable minds have been trying to get their arms around it since before the Christian era.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/28/gary-anderson-on-augustine-and-the-fall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Series on Genesis 1-11</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/28/new-series-on-genesis-1-11/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/28/new-series-on-genesis-1-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am starting a new series of posts on BioLogos on Genesis 1-11. The first two or three will be on &#8220;Israel&#8217;s Two Creations Stories&#8221; (Genesis 1 and 2), and part 1 is up now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am starting a new series of posts on BioLogos on Genesis 1-11. The first two or three will be on &#8220;Israel&#8217;s Two Creations Stories&#8221; (Genesis 1 and 2), and <a href="http://biologos.org/blog/israels-two-creation-stories-part-1/">part 1</a> is up now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/28/new-series-on-genesis-1-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NT Wright interview, 4-20-10</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/19/nt-wright-interview-4-20-09/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/19/nt-wright-interview-4-20-09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inerrancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am interviewing NT Wright in NYC tomorrow on camera for BioLogos. Apparently, you can submit questions through Twitter or the BioLogos Facebook page, and we will see what we can get to.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interviewing NT Wright in NYC tomorrow on camera for BioLogos. Apparently, you can submit questions through Twitter or the BioLogos Facebook page, and we will see what we can get to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/19/nt-wright-interview-4-20-09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World News Tonight interview over Waltke’s Resignation</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/16/world-news-tonight-interview-over-waltkes-resignation/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/16/world-news-tonight-interview-over-waltkes-resignation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inerrancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was interviewed yesterday in my home by ABC&#8217;s World News Tonight to discuss Bruce Waltke&#8217;s resignation from RTS last week. I had a chance to focus on some of the larger issues involved regarding Evangelicals, science, and faith. About two hours with the ABC crew will likely result in about 7 seconds of air [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was interviewed yesterday in my home by ABC&#8217;s World News Tonight to discuss Bruce Waltke&#8217;s resignation from RTS last week. I had a chance to focus on some of the larger issues involved regarding Evangelicals, science, and faith. About two hours with the ABC crew will likely result in about 7 seconds of air time, so we&#8217;ll see what they pick.</p>
<p>The piece will air either tonight (Friday the 16th) or this Sunday night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/16/world-news-tonight-interview-over-waltkes-resignation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
