<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>a time to tear down &#124; A Time to Build Up &#187; biblical theology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peterennsonline.com/category/biblical-theology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peterennsonline.com</link>
	<description>Dr. Peter Enns on the Bible and Contemporary Christian Faith</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 03:50:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Two New Books in the Works</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/06/25/two-new-books-in-the-works/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/06/25/two-new-books-in-the-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 15:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=1064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the next few months, two new books will be released from my editorial purgatory and see the light of day. In October/November, my Ecclesiastes commentary will be available. This is one of the earlier Old Testament volumes in Eerdman&#8217;s Two Horizons series, the focus of which is theological interaction with biblical texts, not the safe, boring, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://peterennsonline.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Eccl-big.jpg"></a><a href="http://peterennsonline.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Enns_Evolution-of-AdamHALF.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1066 alignleft" title="Layout 1" src="http://peterennsonline.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Enns_Evolution-of-AdamHALF-194x300.jpg" alt="" width="194" height="300" /></a><img class="size-medium wp-image-1065 aligncenter" title="Eccl big" src="http://peterennsonline.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Eccl-big-202x300.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="300" /></p>
<p>In the next few months, two new books will be released from my editorial purgatory and see the light of day.</p>
<p>In October/November, my Ecclesiastes commentary will be available. This is one of the earlier Old Testament volumes in Eerdman&#8217;s <em>Two </em><em>Horizons</em> series, the focus of which is theological interaction with biblical texts, not the safe, boring, technical things that biblical scholars like me typically gravitate to like: &#8220;Did you know this Hebrew word occurs 17 times in this book and only one other time in the whole BIble? Wow!! Why aren&#8217;t you excited like me?&#8221; Or, &#8220;Watch me take this very common Hebrew word and interpet it in an utterly unique way because what I wrote in the previous paragraph depends on it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Things like that.</p>
<p>The commentary is divided into two parts roughly equal in length.</p>
<p>(1) Interaction with the Hebrew text (complete with transliterations and without getting stuffy about it).</p>
<p>(2) Interacting with the theology of Ecclesiasties.</p>
<p>The second half is made up of three parts. I first give an overview of the theological content of Ecclesiastes, then Ecclesiastes in the context of the Old and New Testament, and finally the significance of Ecclesiastes for theology and praxis today.</p>
<p>Those of you who know me well will not be surprised that in the theological section I apply a Christotelic hermeneutic. Also, for the truly geekified among you, I do not see Qohelet&#8217;s words as corrected by the epilogue but affirmed as wise&#8211;though not the final word. I also see Qohelet as a suffering Christ figure. (Yes, you heard me right.)</p>
<p>The second book, <em>The Evolution of Adam </em>(Brazos) should be out by January 1, although I have a fleet of lawyers trying to &#8220;encourage&#8221; the publisher to have it out in time to satisfy your gift-giving holiday needs.</p>
<p>For those familiar with my blogging on BioLogos, some of this book will be familiar&#8211;though I go into much greater detail than I could in blog posts and bring much more into the discussion.</p>
<p>The book is divided into two parts. Part one focuses on Genesis, and my general point is that the creation stories are part of Israel&#8217;s literature of national and religious self-definition. In other words, they are not prepared to give the type of (historical and scientific) information we ask for today when speaking of &#8220;human origins.&#8221;  To seek such information is to misread Genesis, and so attempts to align science and Genesis get us off on the foot altogether by not taking the biblical text on its own terms.</p>
<p>Part two focuses on Paul&#8217;s use of the Adam story in Romans 5. Paul&#8217;s reading of the Adam story, despite superficial appearances, is hardly straightforward, and appreciating the theological subtly and depth of Paul&#8217;s words requires much more of us than simply opening an English Bible, reading a few verses, and drawing conclusions. I go on and on about this for a lot of pages, because this is a far more pressing problem for most Christian readers than Genesis.</p>
<p>The audience for the commentary is seminarians, pastors, and scholars. For <em>The Evolution of Adam,</em> the intended audience is similar to that of <em>Inspiration and Incarnation</em>: lay readers looking for different approaches to old problems. In fact, <em>The Evolution of Adam </em>applies the approach of <em>Inspiration and Incarnation</em> to a specific and pressing issue: in view of evolution, what does it mean to read the Bible well? So think of <em>EOA</em> as <em>I&amp;I</em> part two.</p>
<p>As time gets closer, I will blog more about these books, provide a table of contents, and maybe&#8230;if you&#8217;re nice&#8230;post some small excerpts to get you to read the books&#8211;or at least buy them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2011/06/25/two-new-books-in-the-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Announcing Eyes to See and Ears to Hear: Essays in Memory of J. Alan Groves</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/10/20/announcing-eyes-to-see-and-ears-to-hear-essays-in-memory-of-j-alan-groves/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/10/20/announcing-eyes-to-see-and-ears-to-hear-essays-in-memory-of-j-alan-groves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 01:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology applied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reformed theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spirituality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Waltke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Welch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[j. alan groves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion and Spirituality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sinclair Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westminster Theological Seminary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am very proud to announce the release of Eyes to See and Ears to Hear: Essays in Memory of J. Alan Groves. I, along with my former colleagues Doug Green and Mike Kelly, worked for three years bringing these essays together, and we are thrilled to be able to honor Al&#8217;s memory in this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div id="attachment_957" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><a href="http://peterennsonline.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/9781596381223.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-957" title="Eyes to See and Ears to Hear 9781596381223" src="http://peterennsonline.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/9781596381223-200x300.jpg" alt="Eyes to See and Ears to Hear 9781596381223" width="200" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Click for Full Size Image</p></div>
<p>I am very proud to announce the release of <em>Eyes to See and Ears  to Hear: Essays in Memory of J. Alan Groves</em>. I, along with my former  colleagues Doug Green and Mike Kelly, worked for three years bringing  these essays together, and we are thrilled to be able to honor Al&#8217;s  memory in this way. Al taught all of us Hebrew during our student years  at Westminster Theological Seminary, and he was our colleague as well  until he succumbed to cancer on February 5, 2007, at the age of 54.</p>
</div>
<p>In  addition to the three editors, contributors include Tremper Longman  III, Bruce Waltke, and Karen Jobes, and various blessings and reminiscences are offered by former friends and colleagues, including  Sam Logan, Ed Welch, Sinclair Ferguson, and Steve Taylor.</p>
<p>We  were able to present Al&#8217;s widow Libbie and their four children with a  mock copy of the book this past summer at a surprise gathering of many  of the contributors. But today is a proud moment for all of us.</p>
<p>Pete</p>
<p><a href="http://peterennsonline.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/9781596381223.pdf">View endorsements; table of contents; foreword by Moises Silva; preface by the editors; personal words about Al Groves from Sinclair Ferguson, Samuel T Logan, Jr., Eep Talstra, and Ed Welch; Al&#8217;s own letter written to be read at his memorial service; and the full chapter &#8220;Why Do Bad Things Happen to Good People? A Biblical-Theological Approach&#8221; by Tremper Longman III</a> (PDF)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1596381221?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=inspirandinca-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=1596381221">Purchase at Amazon</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.prpbooks.com/inventory.html?target=indiv_title&amp;id=2066">Purchase at P&amp;R Books</a></p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_c.png?x-id=62375e5c-a1d6-46c1-9b7b-2b6c053a72b4" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/10/20/announcing-eyes-to-see-and-ears-to-hear-essays-in-memory-of-j-alan-groves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Creator is the Redeemer</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/07/20/the-creator-is-the-redeemer/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/07/20/the-creator-is-the-redeemer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week&#8217;s BioLogos post is up. It is a bit of a departure from the typical, but I think helps to round out an important biblical theological theme.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biologos.org/blog/the-creator-is-the-redeemer/">This week&#8217;s</a> BioLogos post is up. It is a bit of a departure from the typical, but I think helps to round out an important biblical theological theme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/07/20/the-creator-is-the-redeemer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jesus and the Sea</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/07/14/jesus-and-th-sea/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/07/14/jesus-and-th-sea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT use of the OT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week&#8217;s BioLogos post is up. Jesus calming the storm and waking on the water reflect the Old Testament theme of Yahweh taming the waters.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s BioLogos <a href="http://biologos.org/blog/jesus-and-the-sea/">post</a> is up. Jesus calming the storm and waking on the water reflect the Old Testament theme of Yahweh taming the waters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/07/14/jesus-and-th-sea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gilgamesh, Atrahasis, and the Flood, Parts 2 and 3</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/06/22/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood-parts-2-and-3/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/06/22/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood-parts-2-and-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The final two parts (two and three) of my three-part discussion of the biblical flood vis-a-vis Mesopotamian literature is now up on the BioLogos website. Hint, yes I think the Mesopotamian literature is very important for understanding the theology of the biblical story  :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The final two parts (<a href="http://biologos.org/blog/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood-part-2/">two</a> and <a href="http://biologos.org/blog/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood-part-3/#comments">three</a>) of my three-part discussion of the biblical flood vis-a-vis Mesopotamian literature is now up on the BioLogos website. Hint, yes I think the Mesopotamian literature is very important for understanding the theology of the biblical story  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/06/22/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood-parts-2-and-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gilgamesh, Atrahasis, and the Flood</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/06/01/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/06/01/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 17:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is this week&#8217;s BioLogos post where we look at the similarities between these Mesopotamian and the biblical flood story.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biologos.org/blog/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood/">Here</a> is this week&#8217;s BioLogos post where we look at the similarities between these Mesopotamian and the biblical flood story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/06/01/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genesis 2-9 and Atrahasis</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/25/genesis-2-9-and-atrahasis/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/25/genesis-2-9-and-atrahasis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is this week&#8217;s post at BioLogos, this one on the well-known similarities between Israel&#8217;s second creation story and the Atrahasis Epic. As we saw with last week&#8217;s post on Genesis 1 and Enuma Elish, Genesis 2-9 and Atrahasis breathe the same air. They share ancient Mesopotamian ways of talking about origins. This is a clear indication [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biologos.org/blog/the-second-creation-story-and-atrahasis/">Here</a> is this week&#8217;s post at BioLogos, this one on the well-known similarities between Israel&#8217;s second creation story and the Atrahasis Epic. As we saw with last week&#8217;s post on Genesis 1 and <em>Enuma Elish</em>, Genesis 2-9 and <em>Atrahasis</em> breathe the same air. They share ancient Mesopotamian ways of talking about origins. This is a clear indication that the second creation story does not speak to contemporary science. Hence, (1) it cannot and should not be harmonized with contemporary science, (2) it should not control what can be concluded from scientific investigation.</p>
<p>Genesis 2-9 is an ancient story asking addressing ancient issues. Understanding that ancient context will keep us from asking this story to deliver more than it is prepared to. And it will also help us mine the theological depths of what this story said <em>to ancient Israelites</em> nearly three millennia ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/25/genesis-2-9-and-atrahasis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genesis 1 and Enuma Elish</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/19/genesis-1-and-enuma-elish/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/19/genesis-1-and-enuma-elish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 18:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is this week&#8217;s blog post at BioLogos on a perennial topic: the relationship between Genesis 1 and the Babylonian creation myth Enuma Elish. Both stories are distinct yet they clearly breath the same ancient air when it comes to describing origins.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biologos.org/blog/genesis-1-and-a-babylonian-creation-story/">Here</a> is this week&#8217;s blog post at BioLogos on a perennial topic: the relationship between Genesis 1 and the Babylonian creation myth <em>Enuma Elish</em>. Both stories are distinct yet they clearly breath the same ancient air when it comes to describing origins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/19/genesis-1-and-enuma-elish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Israel&#8217;s Two Creation Stories (Part 3)</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/12/israels-two-creation-stories-part-3/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/12/israels-two-creation-stories-part-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 12:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is the third and final BioLogos post on the differences between the two creation accounts in Genesis 1 and 2 (God&#8217;s names, different methods of creating, different views of humanity). The purpose of seeing these differences is not to hold the two stories apart, but to understand why they are placed where they are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biologos.org/blog/israels-two-creation-stories-part-3/">Here</a> is the third and final BioLogos post on the differences between the two creation accounts in Genesis 1 and 2 (God&#8217;s names, different methods of creating, different views of humanity). The purpose of seeing these differences is not to hold the two stories apart, but to understand why they are placed where they are in the Old Testament. Blurring the differences will blur the theology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/12/israels-two-creation-stories-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on Israel&#8217;s Two Creation Stories</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/04/more-on-israels-two-creation-stories/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/04/more-on-israels-two-creation-stories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 21:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part two of my summary of the differences between the two creation stories in Genesis is posted today on the BioLogos blog. This week I look at the different literary styles and different depictions of God.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part two of my summary of the differences between the two creation stories in Genesis is posted today on the BioLogos <a href="http://biologos.org/blog/israels-two-creation-stories-part-2/">blog</a>. This week I look at the different literary styles and different depictions of God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/04/more-on-israels-two-creation-stories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

