<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>a time to tear down &#124; A Time to Build Up &#187; old testament history</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peterennsonline.com/category/old-testament-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peterennsonline.com</link>
	<description>Dr. Peter Enns on the Bible and Contemporary Christian Faith</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 03:50:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gilgamesh, Atrahasis, and the Flood</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/06/01/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/06/01/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 17:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is this week&#8217;s BioLogos post where we look at the similarities between these Mesopotamian and the biblical flood story.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biologos.org/blog/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood/">Here</a> is this week&#8217;s BioLogos post where we look at the similarities between these Mesopotamian and the biblical flood story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/06/01/gilgamesh-atrahasis-and-the-flood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genesis 2-9 and Atrahasis</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/25/genesis-2-9-and-atrahasis/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/25/genesis-2-9-and-atrahasis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is this week&#8217;s post at BioLogos, this one on the well-known similarities between Israel&#8217;s second creation story and the Atrahasis Epic. As we saw with last week&#8217;s post on Genesis 1 and Enuma Elish, Genesis 2-9 and Atrahasis breathe the same air. They share ancient Mesopotamian ways of talking about origins. This is a clear indication [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biologos.org/blog/the-second-creation-story-and-atrahasis/">Here</a> is this week&#8217;s post at BioLogos, this one on the well-known similarities between Israel&#8217;s second creation story and the Atrahasis Epic. As we saw with last week&#8217;s post on Genesis 1 and <em>Enuma Elish</em>, Genesis 2-9 and <em>Atrahasis</em> breathe the same air. They share ancient Mesopotamian ways of talking about origins. This is a clear indication that the second creation story does not speak to contemporary science. Hence, (1) it cannot and should not be harmonized with contemporary science, (2) it should not control what can be concluded from scientific investigation.</p>
<p>Genesis 2-9 is an ancient story asking addressing ancient issues. Understanding that ancient context will keep us from asking this story to deliver more than it is prepared to. And it will also help us mine the theological depths of what this story said <em>to ancient Israelites</em> nearly three millennia ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/25/genesis-2-9-and-atrahasis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genesis 1 and Enuma Elish</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/19/genesis-1-and-enuma-elish/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/19/genesis-1-and-enuma-elish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 18:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is this week&#8217;s blog post at BioLogos on a perennial topic: the relationship between Genesis 1 and the Babylonian creation myth Enuma Elish. Both stories are distinct yet they clearly breath the same ancient air when it comes to describing origins.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biologos.org/blog/genesis-1-and-a-babylonian-creation-story/">Here</a> is this week&#8217;s blog post at BioLogos on a perennial topic: the relationship between Genesis 1 and the Babylonian creation myth <em>Enuma Elish</em>. Both stories are distinct yet they clearly breath the same ancient air when it comes to describing origins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/19/genesis-1-and-enuma-elish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Israel&#8217;s Two Creation Stories (Part 3)</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/12/israels-two-creation-stories-part-3/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/12/israels-two-creation-stories-part-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 12:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is the third and final BioLogos post on the differences between the two creation accounts in Genesis 1 and 2 (God&#8217;s names, different methods of creating, different views of humanity). The purpose of seeing these differences is not to hold the two stories apart, but to understand why they are placed where they are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biologos.org/blog/israels-two-creation-stories-part-3/">Here</a> is the third and final BioLogos post on the differences between the two creation accounts in Genesis 1 and 2 (God&#8217;s names, different methods of creating, different views of humanity). The purpose of seeing these differences is not to hold the two stories apart, but to understand why they are placed where they are in the Old Testament. Blurring the differences will blur the theology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/12/israels-two-creation-stories-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on Israel&#8217;s Two Creation Stories</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/04/more-on-israels-two-creation-stories/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/04/more-on-israels-two-creation-stories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 21:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part two of my summary of the differences between the two creation stories in Genesis is posted today on the BioLogos blog. This week I look at the different literary styles and different depictions of God.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part two of my summary of the differences between the two creation stories in Genesis is posted today on the BioLogos <a href="http://biologos.org/blog/israels-two-creation-stories-part-2/">blog</a>. This week I look at the different literary styles and different depictions of God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/05/04/more-on-israels-two-creation-stories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Series on Genesis 1-11</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/28/new-series-on-genesis-1-11/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/28/new-series-on-genesis-1-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am starting a new series of posts on BioLogos on Genesis 1-11. The first two or three will be on &#8220;Israel&#8217;s Two Creations Stories&#8221; (Genesis 1 and 2), and part 1 is up now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am starting a new series of posts on BioLogos on Genesis 1-11. The first two or three will be on &#8220;Israel&#8217;s Two Creations Stories&#8221; (Genesis 1 and 2), and <a href="http://biologos.org/blog/israels-two-creation-stories-part-1/">part 1</a> is up now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/28/new-series-on-genesis-1-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creating Adam</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/06/creating-adam/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/06/creating-adam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 12:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT use of the OT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My latest post about Adam is up at BioLogos. My point here is that any way of looking at Adam that does not accept Paul&#8217;s view of human descent from a first pair in recent history is &#8220;creating&#8221; an Adam beyond biblical parameters, and that such creative work is inevitable. My post today fits nicely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My latest <a href="http://biologos.org/blog/creating-adam/">post</a> about Adam is up at BioLogos. My point here is that any way of looking at Adam that does not accept Paul&#8217;s view of human descent from a first pair in recent history is &#8220;creating&#8221; an Adam beyond biblical parameters, and that such creative work is inevitable. My post today fits nicely with yesterday&#8217;s <a href="http://biologos.org/blog/does-genetics-point-to-a-single-primal-couple/">post</a> on the genetic impossibility of a first pair from which all human life descended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/04/06/creating-adam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adam is Israel</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/03/02/adam-is-israel/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/03/02/adam-is-israel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is my latest BioLogos post. This one is on how Adam is not the first human but &#8220;proto-Israel.&#8221; The point here follows on my previous posts on the cosmic battle motif in Exodus.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biologos.org/blog/adam-is-israel/">Here</a> is my latest BioLogos post. This one is on how Adam is not the first human but &#8220;proto-Israel.&#8221; The point here follows on my previous posts on the cosmic battle motif in Exodus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/03/02/adam-is-israel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exodus, Mt. Sinai and Creation</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/02/23/exodus-mt-sinai-and-creation/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/02/23/exodus-mt-sinai-and-creation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is my next BioLogos post on Exodus and the Cosmic battle.  I will have one more in the series next week, at which time I hope to start negotiating the film rights. This post is about how the tabernacle and the law are creation events. It will change your life&#8230;.or at least hold your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my next <a href="http://biologos.org/blog/exodus-mt-sinai-and-creation/">BioLogos</a> post on Exodus and the Cosmic battle.  I will have one more in the series next week, at which time I hope to start negotiating the film rights. This post is about how the tabernacle and the law are creation events. It will change your life&#8230;.or at least hold your interest for a few minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/02/23/exodus-mt-sinai-and-creation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exodus and the Cosmic Battle (Again)</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/02/17/exodus-and-the-cosmic-battle-again/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/02/17/exodus-and-the-cosmic-battle-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old testament history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is my latest BioLogos post. I look at the plagues as the reintroduction of chaos and how several themes come together at the Red Sea incident.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my latest <a href="http://biologos.org/blog/exodus-and-the-cosmic-battle-again/">BioLogos</a> post. I look at the plagues as the reintroduction of chaos and how several themes come together at the Red Sea incident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2010/02/17/exodus-and-the-cosmic-battle-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

