Thoughts, musings, interactions, responses…about or inspired by the book

• Bruce Waltke’s Revisiting Inspiration and Incarnation and my Response from the Westminster Theological Journal (Spring 2009)
• My response to the Introduction of Bruce Waltke’s surrejoinder to my response above.
• Responses to Some General Criticisms of I&I
  • Introduction
  • Criticism 1: I&I Is Inconsistent with the Reformed Faith
  • Criticism 2: I&I Ignores Other Possible Solutions
  • Criticism 3: I&I Denies Inerrancy
  • Criticism 4: There Is a Lack of Precision and Clarity in I&I
  • Criticism 5: There Are Important Scholars Who Disagree with I&I
• Some Reflections on I&I and the Reformed Tradition:
  • Intro
  • The Authority of Scripture
  • WCF Chapter 1, Scriptural Authority, and Confessionalism
  • Inerrancy
  • The Audience of I&I
• A Response to Paul Helm’s Review of Inspiration and Incarnation
• A “Conversation” with Richard Pratt’s “Westminster and Contemporary Reformed Hermeneutics”