Dr. Peter Enns on the Bible and Contemporary Christian Faith

Welcome to
a time to tear down | A Time to Build Up

Dr. Peter E. EnnsThe focus of this website is Biblical Theology and Biblical Studies and how these fields interface with contemporary Christian faith. Although I certainly hope that some of what is expressed here will be persuasive to some readers, my intention is not to debate but to continue conversations on matters that I feel are very important. Read more >>>

Dr. Peter Enns

The Creator is the Redeemer

This week’s BioLogos post is up. It is a bit of a departure from the typical, but I think helps to round out an important biblical theological theme.


Jesus and the Sea

This week’s BioLogos post is up. Jesus calming the storm and waking on the water reflect the Old Testament theme of Yahweh taming the waters.


The Faith to Doubt

A pastor friend of mine lent me a book by M. Holmes Hartshorne, The Faith to Doubt (Prentice-Hall, 1963). He and I have been talking and thinking a lot about the reality of doubt in the Christian life and the spiritual role that it plays.

Hartshorne was Professor of Philosophy and Religion at Colgate with a Th.D from Union Theological Seminary. He studied under Paul Tillich.

The book’s thesis is this: Doubt and Faith are inseparable, and this is the Protestant way. He looks at several areas of 20th century intellectual criticism and argues that Protestants need to listen to these critiques in order to become more consistently Christian, rather than allay religious doubts by offering ready answers that ignore the criticisms.

There are some holes in the book, and it is a bit dated in some respects. (Yes, that was the standard academic statement I am bound by union contract to give whenever I am about to engage another academic.) Still, I found what he had to say very interesting, even timely. He looks at the following criticisms of Christianity: Psychological (Freud), Sociological (Marx), Epistemological (can we really “know” that God exists?), Moral (problem of evil), and Natural Religion (man’s search for meaning).

At each point the author says, “Listen to the criticism. It is valid because Protestantism has lost its biblical, prophetic voice and become simply ‘religion.’ These criticisms show us where Christianity has turned to idolatry. They also remind us that honest and creative doubt have always been and will always be  part of the Christian experience.”

I was struck by how Hartshorne limits this to a specifically Protestant trait when in fact the Roman Catholic tradition was there centuries earlier. Leaving that to the side, here are a couple of quotes to give you a feel for the book.

“From the prophetic perspective, religion is the highest expression of human sin. Because it allegedly serves him who is above all criticism, religion can neatly cloak the pretensions and perversions of he human spirit and give them the appearance of godliness. God is thus made to bless idolatry. Forms and means of divine worship such as prayers, ceremonies, priesthood, and synagogue readily become the occasion of self worship, concealing the pride and folly out of which they spring” (p. 6)

Feel free to translate that observation to the denomination of your choice.

Speaking of the Marxist critique that religions reflect the basic social structures that sustain them, Hartshorne welcomes the recognition of cultural relativity as a critique of the “transient character of our religious beliefs and the social dynamics of their change” (p. 38) He continues the thought on pp. 38.

“For the poisons of obscurantism and dogmatism, relativism is a healthy antidote. It compels us to recognize the limited character of our wisdom and of the historical situation in which we necessarily must make our judgment and form our beliefs. We do not stand above history, but in it. Our insights, including our religious insights, are ours–a reflection of the social context in which our lot is cast. In this regard cultural relativism is quite congenial with biblical faith. The Bible knows nothing of an eternal human wisdom transcending men’s historical limitations.”

If I wanted to, I could parse out some of what he says here and criticize it, but the heart of his observation remains. He then goes on to show, correctly, how the Bible itself reflects the cultures in which they were written: Jesus and the NT authors share beliefs current among Jews of the time, Genesis reflects ancient cosmology, etc., etc.

If doubt is an active topic in your Christian journey, you might want to take a look at this book.


Open for Comments

For a number of complex reasons, the most important of which being “I feel like it,” I am opening up comments on my posts after a two-year self-absorbed imposition of silence. We’ll see how this goes. I will do my best to interact, and don’t take it personally if I don’t. Do take it personally, however, if you post a rude, irrelevant, obnoxious comment and I remove it with much fanfare.

All kidding aside, we are engaging issues of ultimate meaning and purpose. Hearing from each other seems like a good idea.


Marilynne Robinson on The Daily Show on Science and Religion

Pulitzer Prize (Gilead, 2004) winning author Marilynne Robinson was on The Daily Show recently plugging her new book Absence of Mind. The five-minute segment was about the proper relationship between Science and Religion. Robinson’s view, which she states very gently, is that the two “should not be at odds.” So why are they? Here is your zen quote of the day: “The gladiators for both sides are inferior representatives of these sides.” Game. Set. Match.


My Response to Al Mohler and the Age of the Earth

Al Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, has argued recently in a public lecture that it is theologically necessary to say that the earth only appears to be old rather than actually being old. Otherwise, a literal interpretation of the first chapter of Genesis is in jeopardy.

He mentioned in his presentation the BioLogos Foundation as a being on the wrong side of this culture war, a since we are not biblical literalists and we feel science affects how we read the biblical account of creation. Along the way, Mohler made numerous statments about Darwin, science, and biblical interpretation that are simply wrong, ungenerous, and potentially misleading to his listeners, so we thought we would respond.

My response follows that of Darrel Falk’s and Karl Giberson’s (here and here). A transcript of Mohler’s presentation can be found here and the video here.


Does God Talk to Us Through Fiction?

I had an article posted today in the Huffington Post in their Religion and Science section. I make the point that conservative Christians and New Atheists share fundamentalist assumptions about the Bible that block their participation in the science/faith discussion.

I will now sit back and wait for book and movie deals to come pouring in. Please don’t call me as I need to leave the phone lines open.


New Bible Curriculum “Telling God’s Story” coming in February 2011

I have been working on a Bible curriculum for Olive Branch Books, the religious instruction imprint of Peace Hill Press founded by well-known author, historian, and homeschooling guru  Susan Wise Bauer.

In February 2011 the Parents’ Guide and 1st grade material will be available. Grade 2 will come out later that year, with a publication schedule of two curriculum years each year thereafter.

The Parents’ Guide introduces the approach taken in the curriculum, which differs from others on the market. The curriculum is divided into three phases: grades 1-4, 5-8, and 9-12. Each lesson begins with a “parent text” that explains the passage to parents in more detail, followed  by the children’s lesson. There is one lesson per week with activities for each day of that week to reinforce the lesson.

Rather than beginning at the youngest ages with Bible stories or moral lessons, the first phase of this curriculum introduces children to Jesus as he would have been introduced to the first Christians: though his stories, teachings, miracles, events of his life, and other things.

Having been introduced to Jesus, the second phase moves toward a sweeping grasp of Israel’s story. Here, too, we do not think in terms of moral lessons or character studies, i.e., “be like David, or Abraham, or Moses here (but not there).” We focus on what part in Israel’s story Abraham, Moses, and David play. In other words, for those of you who are familiar with the term, we are taking a redemptive-historical or biblical theological approach to teaching children the Bible.

The third phase (high school) will focus on historical backgrounds. Many young children leave high school and go to college to find that their understanding of the Bible is superficial and susceptible to strong criticism. They cannot interact well with the kinds of historical issues raised regularly on the History Channel, Time Magazine, or The DaVinci Code. We will address all sorts of issues of historical context for the Bible, not in a defensive, apologetic manner, but with an attitude of learning more deeply how “God’s Story” was heard in the ancient world.

The links above point you to sample sections.


The Benefit of Doubt

Here is this week’s BioLogos post. Doubt is a normal part of the Christian faith. It is expected. But it is more than something we have to put up with. It is a gift from God to move us away from the shallowness of our own conceptions of God to grater depth and intimacy. The stress some feel in thinking through new and challenging issues, like evolution, may be God’s way of moving us out of our comfort zones.


Gilgamesh, Atrahasis, and the Flood, Parts 2 and 3

The final two parts (two and three) of my three-part discussion of the biblical flood vis-a-vis Mesopotamian literature is now up on the BioLogos website. Hint, yes I think the Mesopotamian literature is very important for understanding the theology of the biblical story  :-)