<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>a time to tear down &#124; A Time to Build Up &#187; contemporary christianity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peterennsonline.com/tag/contemporary-christianity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peterennsonline.com</link>
	<description>Dr. Peter Enns on the Bible and Contemporary Christian Faith</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 16:45:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Science &amp; the Sacred Post: A Different Angle</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/12/04/new-science-the-sacred-post-a-different-angle/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/12/04/new-science-the-sacred-post-a-different-angle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elsewhere on the web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature of scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a new guest post on the Science and the Sacred Blog or the BioLogos Foundation (@BioLogosOrg on Twitter). This one is called &#8220;Let&#8217;s Come at This From a Different Angle.&#8221; I propose that our reading of the opening chapters of the Bible ought to be informed by the closing chapters of the Bible. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a new guest post on the <a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/scienceandthesacred/">Science and the Sacred Blog</a> or the <a href="http://biologos.org/">BioLogos Foundation</a> (@BioLogosOrg on Twitter). This one is called &#8220;<a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/scienceandthesacred/2009/12/lets-come-at-this-from-a-different-angle.html">Let&#8217;s Come at This From a Different Angle</a>.&#8221; I propose that our reading of the opening chapters of the Bible ought to be informed by the closing chapters of the Bible.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/scienceandthesacred/2009/12/lets-come-at-this-from-a-different-angle.html">Read the full post</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/scienceandthesacred/author/pete-enns/2009/12/">Read all my Science &amp; the Sacred posts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/12/04/new-science-the-sacred-post-a-different-angle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest Posts at Science and the Sacred Blog</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/12/02/guest-posts-at-science-and-the-sacred-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/12/02/guest-posts-at-science-and-the-sacred-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elsewhere on the web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I&I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incarnational analogy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My friends (and now colleagues) at the BioLogos Foundation recently asked me to write a series of blog posts for them concerning how an incarnational approach to Scripture might contribute toward clearing away some misunderstandings that have exacerbated the  perceived conflict between the Bible and science. The first three posts in that series are linked [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friends (and <a href="http://peterennsonline.com/2009/12/02/new-position-biologos-foundation-senior-fellow-of-biblical-studies/">now colleagues</a>) at the <a href="http://biologos.org/">BioLogos Foundation</a> recently asked me to write a series of blog posts for them concerning how an incarnational approach to Scripture might contribute toward clearing away some misunderstandings that have exacerbated the  perceived conflict between the Bible and science. The first three posts in that series are linked below. Others are coming, so be sure to check it out.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/scienceandthesacred/2009/11/science-and-an-incarnational-approach-to-the-bible.html">Science and an Incarnational Approach to the Bible</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/scienceandthesacred/2009/11/an-incarnational-model.html">An Incarnational Model</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/scienceandthesacred/2009/11/mesopotamian-myths-and-genre-calibration.html">Mesopotamian Myths and &#8220;Genre Calibration&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/12/02/guest-posts-at-science-and-the-sacred-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Position: BioLogos Foundation Senior Fellow of Biblical Studies</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/12/02/new-position-biologos-foundation-senior-fellow-of-biblical-studies/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/12/02/new-position-biologos-foundation-senior-fellow-of-biblical-studies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biologos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evangelicalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scripture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On December 1, 2009, the BioLogos Foundation published the following announcement: The BioLogos Foundation is happy to announce that biblical scholar Pete Enns has joined our team as a senior fellow of biblical studies. Enns is an evangelical Christian scholar and author of several books and commentaries, including the popular Inspiration and Incarnation: Evangelicals and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biologos.org/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-669" title="biologos_logo" src="http://peterennsonline.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/biologos_logo.jpg" alt="biologos_logo" width="200" height="143" /></a>On December 1, 2009, the <a href="http://biologos.org/">BioLogos Foundation</a> published the following announcement:</p>
<blockquote><p>The BioLogos Foundation is happy to announce that biblical scholar Pete Enns has joined our team as a senior fellow of biblical studies. Enns is an evangelical Christian scholar and author of several books and commentaries, including the popular <a href="http://biologos.org/resources/inspiration-and-incarnation/"><em>Inspiration and Incarnation: Evangelicals and the Problem of the Old Testament</em></a>, which looks at three questions raised by biblical scholars that seem to threaten traditional views of Scripture. Enns has also been a contributor to our blog <a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/scienceandthesacred/" target="_blank"><em>Science &amp; the Sacred</em></a>. His full biography can be found under <a href="http://biologos.org/about/team">“Team Members”</a> in our <a href="http://biologos.org/about/">“About Us”</a> section.</p></blockquote>
<p>BioLogos represents the harmony of science and faith. It addresses the central themes of science and religion and emphasizes the compatibility of Christian faith with scientific discoveries about the origins of the universe and life.  To communicate this message to the general public and add to the ongoing dialog, The BioLogos Foundation created <a href="http://biologos.org/">BioLogos.org</a>.</p>
<p>You can get regular updates and links to resources from BioLogos by following them on Twitter (@BioLogosOrg) or by becoming a &#8220;fan&#8221; of their <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-BioLogos-Foundation/91142327180?ref=ts#/pages/The-BioLogos-Foundation/91142327180">Facebook Page</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/12/02/new-position-biologos-foundation-senior-fellow-of-biblical-studies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interview with Ken Schenck: Parts 1-3</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/02/26/interview-with-ken-schenck-parts-1-3/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/02/26/interview-with-ken-schenck-parts-1-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calvinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evangelicalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/?p=361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ken Schenck (professor of New Testament and Philosophy at Indiana Wesleyan University) is publishing a multi-part interview with me on his blog, Quadrilateral Thoughts. The first three parts are listed below: 1. A &#8220;Snapshot&#8221; of Peter Enns 2. Is Peter Enns a Good Calvinist? 3. Peter Enns on Nazarenes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://kenschenck.blogspot.com/2009/01/who-is-ken-schenck.html">Ken Schenck</a> (professor of New Testament and Philosophy at Indiana Wesleyan University) is publishing a multi-part interview with me on his blog, <a href="http://kenschenck.blogspot.com/">Quadrilateral Thoughts</a>. The first three parts are listed below:</p>
<p>1. <a href="http://kenschenck.blogspot.com/2009/02/q-with-peter-enns-1.html">A &#8220;Snapshot&#8221; of Peter Enns</a></p>
<p>2.<a href="http://kenschenck.blogspot.com/2009/02/q-with-peter-enns-2.html"> Is Peter Enns a Good Calvinist?</a></p>
<p>3. <a href="http://kenschenck.blogspot.com/search/label/Peter%20Enns">Peter Enns on Nazarenes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2009/02/26/interview-with-ken-schenck-parts-1-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contemporary Christianity in a Post-Religious World</title>
		<link>http://peterennsonline.com/2007/11/08/contemporary-christianity-in-a-post-religious-world/</link>
		<comments>http://peterennsonline.com/2007/11/08/contemporary-christianity-in-a-post-religious-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 03:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete Enns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterennsonline.com/2007/11/08/contemporary-christianity-in-a-post-religious-world/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don’t presume to be able to comment on something as amorphous as “Contemporary Christianity,” at least not in the depth that others are carrying out the discussion. Rather, I would like to put forth a recent experience I had that has helped confirm other experiences and observations I have had over the years, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="content">I don’t presume to be able to comment on something as amorphous as “Contemporary Christianity,” at least not in the depth that others are carrying out the discussion. Rather, I would like to put forth a recent experience I had that has helped confirm other experiences and observations I have had over the years, and that provides at least part of the impetus for a website such as this.</p>
<p class="content">My oldest son is a sophomore in a non-sectarian New England liberal arts college. He elected to take an “Old-Testament-as-Literature” type of course, and occasionally we converse about it. What is striking to me is the manner of interaction he describes with his classmates.</p>
<p class="content">Now, what I am about to say will not make the 6:00 news, nor will it be anything other than stating the obvious for most readers. Still, let me make the point, for it is my experience it is not taken as seriously as it should. </p>
<p class="content">The students in my son’s class are, let us say, not really evangelical. Most of them are certainly not Christian in any viable sense of the word. But neither are they “liberal” in any viable sense of the word. In fact, I would neither describe them as “agnostics” or “atheists,” since both terms presume at least some minimal interaction with what they are either unsure about or dead set against.</p>
<p class="content">These young people are, in fact, more than simply “post-Christian.” They seem to be post-religious. They may have some sense of spirituality, perhaps even find themselves on a self-conscious spiritual journey. But the ultimate truth claims of any religion, let alone the gospel, are not on their radar screens.</p>
<p class="content">They are not primed to come to church to seek out spiritual solace, let alone be challenged. The world in which many of us operate, i.e., which religion is best, or more narrowly, which version of Christianity is best, is not so much ridiculed as it is incomprehensible.</p>
<p class="content">This may strike some as a bit reductionistic of an analysis of our current religious climate, but, in my view, it is born out not simply by this anecdote but by virtually every aspect of the world in which I live every day. People just don’t care.</p>
<p class="content">I have heard it said more than once that the contemporary West has more in common with the paganism of 1st century Palestine–where there was no “Christian subculture” to complicate things–than with the America of our parents. I think this is true, and this is the world into which we as Christians are called to speak. This will involve some risk, some discomfort, some moments of “tearing down” and “building up,” both our own views as well as those of others. </p>
<p class="content">I am interested in seeing how I, in my own little micro-universe of irrelevancy, biblical studies, can bring to bear a field that is my life’s work on the world in which I live. I wish to be engaged in such a project so that I can better understand what it means to have a biblical, Christ-centered understanding of myself and world, so that I can do a better job of representing our Lord (i.e., king, master) wherever I happen to be.</p>
<p class="content">I hope this website will contribute toward that end.</p>
<p class="content">More specifically, two of my areas of interest are Biblical Theology and Biblical Studies. As I hope to clarify, Biblical Theology can offer a paradigm for “building up” our understanding of Scripture that has been challenged (“torn down”) by numerous developments in the modern study of Scripture (as well as many other areas). </p>
<p class="content">I am not quite so self-centered as to think that these two interests of mine should be shared by all. Nor do I think they will shift the balance or win the day. Rather, the task calls for biblicists, theologians, pragmatists, historians, etc., to work collaboratively. All I feel I can do is, as I said before, work in my own area, and contribute as best as I can to help myself and others be more fitting bearers of Christ’s image to a world that has lost interest with “religion,” or “the church,” or “Christianity.” </p>
<p class="content">Interactions such as the ones I envision might help us develop models of Scripture and the Christian faith that are firmly rooted in Scripture and that could provide counter-points to their perceived irrelevancy in our world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peterennsonline.com/2007/11/08/contemporary-christianity-in-a-post-religious-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

