Criticism: I&I denies inerrancy
I have also addressed this issue in a different context elsewhere on this website, but I would like to flesh this out a bit here.
Defining “inerrancy” is certainly a topic of discussion among Evangelicals, and opinions are voiced from one extreme of maintaining older paradigms at all costs to jettisoning the term [...]
The third part of my reflections on Inspiration and Incarnation is now posted. Find all parts posted so far on the I&I page on this site. Or click the title below to go directly to Part 3.
Westminster Confession of Faith 1 Speaks to the Authority of Scripture. It Is Not, in and of Itself, a [...]
With kind permission of the Westminster Theological Journal, I’ve now posted a 2001 article I wrote along with Westminster New Testament professor Dan McCartney titled “Matthew and Hosea: A Response to John Sailhamer.” You’ll find it on the Articles page. Scroll down a bit; the articles are posted in reverse-chronological order (most recent at the [...]